Quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 51:19

אלא לאו ש"מ מכופר דרגל מייתי לה אלמא איכא כופר ברגל ש"מ

Still what analogy is there to inanimate objects, the liability for which is again common with Fire? — The inference might therefore have been from damage done to inanimate objects that were hidden [for which neither Fire nor Pit involve liability]. But still what comparison is there to hidden inanimate objects, the liability for which is common at least with Man [whereas ransom is not common with Man]?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For all civil complaints are merged in the capital accusation of manslaughter; cf. supra, p. 113 and Num. XXXV, 32. ');">³¹</span> — Does this therefore not prove that he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., R. Tarfon. ');">³²</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Kamma 51:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.